Gavin Andresen [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2014-01-30 š Original message:On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at ...
š
Original date posted:2014-01-30
š Original message:On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com> wrote:
> Is this truly the intent? That the merchant/processor takes full
> responsibility for getting the TX confirmed?
>
The intent is to give the customer a great experience. We could talk for
months about whether having the wallet broadcast the transaction as soon as
possible or having it wait for the merchant to respond with a PaymentACK is
better. But I think we should let wallets experiment with different ways of
doing it, and see what works best in practice.
--
--
Gavin Andresen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140130/46892b70/attachment.html>;
š Original message:On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com> wrote:
> Is this truly the intent? That the merchant/processor takes full
> responsibility for getting the TX confirmed?
>
The intent is to give the customer a great experience. We could talk for
months about whether having the wallet broadcast the transaction as soon as
possible or having it wait for the merchant to respond with a PaymentACK is
better. But I think we should let wallets experiment with different ways of
doing it, and see what works best in practice.
--
--
Gavin Andresen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140130/46892b70/attachment.html>;