Event JSON
{
"id": "5bfb6329bc45f60e3b0cd6742a6eae729cf341de1e35cd9da84d667314eb7a18",
"pubkey": "1f9e9062d1a70f94e8f06f0b825cb1d32dbd174ba581261daa31dc3a88eefd55",
"created_at": 1703865700,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"4ba8edfe42735ebf124e435a289d94c25bdd37f679c49450371822ad45974dba",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"56441bb2eb6fd7615feab767c8d716a423f5d4a4b672e99d808056147f65752f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"893a7a349700aac891cae770463146fc6366d92bc974e083d4c6b7fe0e050a27",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"t",
"CyberResilienceAct"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://techpolicy.social/users/maarten/statuses/111664542572042202",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1fw5wmljzwd0t7yjwgddz38v5cfda6dlk08zfg5phrq3263vhfkaq7pe2m5 I love Debian to bits. But its statement on the #CyberResilienceAct is based on old text. I suppose that's inherent in commenting on a draft that is evolving behind closed doors. But now the actual text is public, a number of worries in the Debian statement are no longer an accurate reflection of reality.",
"sig": "04b83ebef745286ca6f299e51e4a711f94fed907ae69fe101428cfd0a94640e8a79c5b59f5de903c3d285c3f9abeb12ad955fe7aa62015357c8e1e5ecfd8dadb"
}
