Johnson Lau [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2018-06-01 📝 Original message:> On 2 Jun 2018, at 2:15 ...
📅 Original date posted:2018-06-01
📝 Original message:> On 2 Jun 2018, at 2:15 AM, Russell O'Connor <roconnor at blockstream.io> wrote:
>
>
> I prefer a different opcode for CHECKSIGFROMSTACK because I dislike opcodes that pop a non-static number of elements off the stack. Popping a dynamic number of stack elements makes it more difficult to validate that a Script pubkey doesn't allow any funny business.
Agreed. This is one of the reasons I think we should remove CHECKMULTISIG in the new script system
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180602/9d05b74e/attachment-0001.html>;
📝 Original message:> On 2 Jun 2018, at 2:15 AM, Russell O'Connor <roconnor at blockstream.io> wrote:
>
>
> I prefer a different opcode for CHECKSIGFROMSTACK because I dislike opcodes that pop a non-static number of elements off the stack. Popping a dynamic number of stack elements makes it more difficult to validate that a Script pubkey doesn't allow any funny business.
Agreed. This is one of the reasons I think we should remove CHECKMULTISIG in the new script system
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180602/9d05b74e/attachment-0001.html>;