_mosso on Nostr: #chekovsphaser nostr:note1hk200q9u0x303f6t88htl7yjqnunf0aj3ljrhypacztdx4xs93cq67wz25

#chekovsphaser

quoting note1hk2…wz25

But it's worse than that. When a tech company designs a device for remote, irreversible, nonconsensual downgrades, they *invite* both external and internal parties to demand those downgrades. Like Pavel Chekov says, a phaser on the bridge in Act I is going to go off by Act III. Selling a product that can be remote, irreversibly, nonconsensually downgraded *inevitably* results in the worst person at the product-planning meeting proposing to do so.

13/