Enlil on Nostr: Whatever the content and regardless the frequency of contact, I'd still call it ...
Whatever the content and regardless the frequency of contact, I'd still call it censorship. It doesn't matter if someone has naught but ill-intent, the message they are attempting to share is being reduced and, thus, censored.
That doesn't mean censorship is a bad thing, so long as you have control over/are in general agreement with what's censored for your personal self, and that's where the reach ends.
We have the choice and the right to block out any content we don't wish to interact with, to our benefit or our detriment. The issue comes in when someone else blocks you from receiving content without your knowledge/consent
That doesn't mean censorship is a bad thing, so long as you have control over/are in general agreement with what's censored for your personal self, and that's where the reach ends.
We have the choice and the right to block out any content we don't wish to interact with, to our benefit or our detriment. The issue comes in when someone else blocks you from receiving content without your knowledge/consent