Dr. Wing, M.D. (blocking gabnigger) on Nostr: This is a lie. "No unsettled lands" implies a finite universe. Western Civilization ...
This is a lie. "No unsettled lands" implies a finite universe. Western Civilization has (at the behest of jews) traded extremely-lucrative space exploration for infinite niggerfaggots. This doesn't make space somehow unexplored or the resources there somehow inaccessible.
Hereditary wealth is a net good which provides resilience to bloodlines with favorable attributes. Case-in-point: if the boomers had given a second thought to what happens after they die their children (most of us on this platform) wouldn't be staring at complete collapse - we would have hard assets passed down from the conquests of our ancestors.
Empires collapse because they fail complete annihilate (genocide) conquered people and re-populate the acquired land with their own, thus incentivizing cosmopolitan faggots (jews) to play races off one another to gain power.
Monarchies are the most resilient form of government and the most sensible. The Monarch is of the same race as his people (always male) and takes a similar role to his people as the father takes to his household. His interests therefore align with the people. Should they deviate, he is a single target who can be dispatched and replaced with either one of his own heirs or a new bloodline. Regardless, it's easier than the infinite conga line of nigger, faggot, and kike "elected officials" and obesoid bureaucrats pointing fingers at each other to obfuscate who is at fault for fuckups in governance.
Also hierarchy is the natural state of man, so a Monarchy is not revolutionary. It's a natural consequence of the Pareto principle and division of labor. Monkeys and pigs have kings.
Hereditary wealth is a net good which provides resilience to bloodlines with favorable attributes. Case-in-point: if the boomers had given a second thought to what happens after they die their children (most of us on this platform) wouldn't be staring at complete collapse - we would have hard assets passed down from the conquests of our ancestors.
Empires collapse because they fail complete annihilate (genocide) conquered people and re-populate the acquired land with their own, thus incentivizing cosmopolitan faggots (jews) to play races off one another to gain power.
Monarchies are the most resilient form of government and the most sensible. The Monarch is of the same race as his people (always male) and takes a similar role to his people as the father takes to his household. His interests therefore align with the people. Should they deviate, he is a single target who can be dispatched and replaced with either one of his own heirs or a new bloodline. Regardless, it's easier than the infinite conga line of nigger, faggot, and kike "elected officials" and obesoid bureaucrats pointing fingers at each other to obfuscate who is at fault for fuckups in governance.
Also hierarchy is the natural state of man, so a Monarchy is not revolutionary. It's a natural consequence of the Pareto principle and division of labor. Monkeys and pigs have kings.