lynn / clarissa on Nostr: Saw a take of "there's no such thing as a feminist reading of history, you're either ...
Saw a take of "there's no such thing as a feminist reading of history, you're either being objective or you're being ideological"
which would be funny about any subject but it's especially wild about history, a topic that has essentially zero objective content
and that's just it
what's that line from foldingideas "in search of a flat earth" something like "their will is a hammer used to shape reality"?
once you notice the pattern you can't unsee how often ignorant wild-ass statements aren't conservatives "being dumb" it's a flex of social power, it is insistence that you admit that their view is objectively correct and you were wrong to even suggest otherwise
there are two sexes, there are five lights, why are you denying objective reality?
which would be funny about any subject but it's especially wild about history, a topic that has essentially zero objective content
and that's just it
what's that line from foldingideas "in search of a flat earth" something like "their will is a hammer used to shape reality"?
once you notice the pattern you can't unsee how often ignorant wild-ass statements aren't conservatives "being dumb" it's a flex of social power, it is insistence that you admit that their view is objectively correct and you were wrong to even suggest otherwise
there are two sexes, there are five lights, why are you denying objective reality?