Jean-Paul Kogelman [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-10-21 📝 Original message:On 2013-10-21, at 2:44 AM, ...

📅 Original date posted:2013-10-21
📝 Original message:On 2013-10-21, at 2:44 AM, Arto Bendiken <arto at bendiken.net> wrote:

>
> Indeed. The BIP analogs that immediately come to mind would be the
> enhancement proposal processes for Python, XMPP, and BitTorrent:

Bitcoin's BIP process is directly based off of Python's PEP process.

Quote from BIP 1, History:

This document was derived heavily from Python's PEP-0001. In many places text was simply copied and modified.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131021/327b7918/attachment.html>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131021/327b7918/attachment.sig>;