matt on Nostr: At least my initial analysis of the data seems to say that degrading instantly is ...
At least my initial analysis of the data seems to say that degrading instantly is better than any other time constant 😭. (May just be some nasty bug in the way we’re calculating probabilities?)
Published at
2024-12-01 01:31:06Event JSON
{
"id": "56b1667d7074844a0b1fbc3b10eac597fc517b20168501da7d013748fba5c9db",
"pubkey": "3d2e51508699f98f0f2bdbe7a45b673c687fe6420f466dc296d90b908d51d594",
"created_at": 1733016666,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5a65b85ccba64fc404e3ac59f4595347dbce0685d43d612ffc2038308c371863",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"f5ed6e2c6587f97b85d968c1c197925156ab6ea5c41fdaae720669be58b0aafa",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6a46242f4d73c14e114d95e1336439f5b91189571dd9c2d4fa418db018cb8ef5"
],
[
"p",
"f1725586a402c06aec818d1478a45aaa0dc16c7a9c4869d97c350336d16f8e43"
]
],
"content": "At least my initial analysis of the data seems to say that degrading instantly is better than any other time constant 😭. (May just be some nasty bug in the way we’re calculating probabilities?)",
"sig": "e8ae6a025d5eb7b172e414e0e06acf5e736344056e98ef48e0dfa57083c074213315cf2a76413d8f94b82f5b61157c12ee8c5f5e03320670aab7f0e5f7a71d7b"
}
