hylomorphic on Nostr: dont need to argue about any definition of bad, just that you use the category. your ...
dont need to argue about any definition of bad, just that you use the category.
your preference of this over that creates the immaterial category.
but since they are no objective truths to ground those preferences, we are back to Thrasymacus and might makes right.
unfortunately feeble grounds to try and fight against the state
you speculate about some fantastical reality where all that exists is matter, and invite me into your gnostic bubble.
it’s just as invalid and stupid as all other gnostic theologies.
u use language, speak to others, attempt to persuade them that your way of thinking is better, should be adopted, all while denying the thing the that makes it all happen
how order came to be is of primary importance because it’s what determines man’s relation to reality.
we find some alien spacecraft, and you want to focus on what color it is, instead of understanding how it came to be.
thx for the mental exercise 🫡
but imma enjoy my saturday
your preference of this over that creates the immaterial category.
but since they are no objective truths to ground those preferences, we are back to Thrasymacus and might makes right.
unfortunately feeble grounds to try and fight against the state
you speculate about some fantastical reality where all that exists is matter, and invite me into your gnostic bubble.
it’s just as invalid and stupid as all other gnostic theologies.
u use language, speak to others, attempt to persuade them that your way of thinking is better, should be adopted, all while denying the thing the that makes it all happen
how order came to be is of primary importance because it’s what determines man’s relation to reality.
we find some alien spacecraft, and you want to focus on what color it is, instead of understanding how it came to be.
thx for the mental exercise 🫡
but imma enjoy my saturday