banev on Nostr: Sorry. Very dubious thing this Declaration... ((( A lot of self-contradictory, ...
Sorry. Very dubious thing this Declaration... ((( A lot of self-contradictory, narcissistic and just false statements, seems like being written by honest and hot but just 18-years olds without much thinking or experience or knowledge of the world. Paul Rosenberg has much more sense. If I wasn't aware of real normal libertarians with common sense and had this as a typical example of libertarian thought, I would consider all libertarians as just another hormon-ruled mob of youngsters. Who a lot of libertarians are in fact, which is a pity and a hindrance for any practical action from them.
just for example:
"we oppose aggression, and coercion" and then "We will consider traps laid for us to be criminal offenses." and "when you hurt us, we will bite back. If you leave us alone we will leave you alone and you can continue to rule" --- for real? how exactly they will bite without aggression? Do they have means to bite back of this is just words? I would bet for the latter, who can - don't talk.
"if you come after us, there will be consequences" --- oh really? What for example, again without aggression?
"we no longer accept unearned suffering as our role in life", "we suffered along with everyone else" --- reads as just one more woke and contemporary "touchy" thing, oh we are so suffering and this is so unearned... I'm not suffering, don't know why they are...
"We are no longer your citizens or your subjects." --- will they require to burn the passports and IDs to be included? If not, this is just words.
"You claim ultimate control of our property and our decisions" --- nobody claims control of my decisions, don't know about theirs...
"those like you have either hated or killed every sufficiently independent human". --- this is just wrong and false statement (as a lot of other stuff inside); even rulers don't hate or kill every sufficiently independent human, mostly they didn't care if you don't touch them.
Better declarations are available
just for example:
"we oppose aggression, and coercion" and then "We will consider traps laid for us to be criminal offenses." and "when you hurt us, we will bite back. If you leave us alone we will leave you alone and you can continue to rule" --- for real? how exactly they will bite without aggression? Do they have means to bite back of this is just words? I would bet for the latter, who can - don't talk.
"if you come after us, there will be consequences" --- oh really? What for example, again without aggression?
"we no longer accept unearned suffering as our role in life", "we suffered along with everyone else" --- reads as just one more woke and contemporary "touchy" thing, oh we are so suffering and this is so unearned... I'm not suffering, don't know why they are...
"We are no longer your citizens or your subjects." --- will they require to burn the passports and IDs to be included? If not, this is just words.
"You claim ultimate control of our property and our decisions" --- nobody claims control of my decisions, don't know about theirs...
"those like you have either hated or killed every sufficiently independent human". --- this is just wrong and false statement (as a lot of other stuff inside); even rulers don't hate or kill every sufficiently independent human, mostly they didn't care if you don't touch them.
Better declarations are available