AbstractEquilibrium on Nostr: If the problem is that hydrocarbon fuels provably gave us unimaginable potential at a ...
If the problem is that hydrocarbon fuels provably gave us unimaginable potential at a cost derived from fear, while futuristic energy sources (except for nuclear) give us less potential with more immediate & real costs, what exactly is the hypothesis? "More people in immediate emergy poverty is better for the planet" seems to be seriously backwards.
Published at
2024-10-27 01:47:04Event JSON
{
"id": "53e96eab39c4027b6d3bce1b093ca05674e05a4ea26346b04085d083bf7c3758",
"pubkey": "f26626a94189b945a0f0146b16c4f8a6ced31b359848433fb6306f8d6eec3661",
"created_at": 1729993624,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"84eb55e0b1ac673277a8753f80e1178619d5c4cab08d08f3f28d73b359b2dd5b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"ff8b76609f545257e470f1817f0a42defd69cbc902757cc7f79a4988a13c17be"
]
],
"content": "If the problem is that hydrocarbon fuels provably gave us unimaginable potential at a cost derived from fear, while futuristic energy sources (except for nuclear) give us less potential with more immediate \u0026 real costs, what exactly is the hypothesis? \"More people in immediate emergy poverty is better for the planet\" seems to be seriously backwards.",
"sig": "3686332c59f7ac8324c9a4a076ee321d115edfa9a0c849f4c1f90759787eb54babb9e2a6cb3cc73e51d4ee4a5003a4e67168955fd506732688d2766cbcc253db"
}
