:blobcatverified2: on Nostr: nano 🎄 I don't want to imply anything to anyone here, neither you nor ginny, ...
nano 🎄 (npub1lr0…w9j8)
I don't want to imply anything to anyone here, neither you nor ginny, however i want to comment on that:
> i am writing this post and deciding to name her because she has told commenter that she is writing up the story of how commenter “assaulted” her to post publicly on her website including his real name
If it is a "conflict" between 2 unknown persons who both do not use clear names, a public warning can be reasonable (from the viewing angle of the person who was assaulted), altho for me there exist no rational reason to use this warning to dox that person. It does not help, change or have any other influence to situation whether the accused person is known with a clear name or not on the internet.
So if the clear name is published, I would put myself on the side that was doxed.
But in general, as an outsider, one can't contribute anything to the actual conflict.
I don't want to imply anything to anyone here, neither you nor ginny, however i want to comment on that:
> i am writing this post and deciding to name her because she has told commenter that she is writing up the story of how commenter “assaulted” her to post publicly on her website including his real name
If it is a "conflict" between 2 unknown persons who both do not use clear names, a public warning can be reasonable (from the viewing angle of the person who was assaulted), altho for me there exist no rational reason to use this warning to dox that person. It does not help, change or have any other influence to situation whether the accused person is known with a clear name or not on the internet.
So if the clear name is published, I would put myself on the side that was doxed.
But in general, as an outsider, one can't contribute anything to the actual conflict.