📅 Original date posted:2017-03-08 📝 Original message:> Am 08.03.2017 um 22:09 ...

Jonas Schnelli [ARCHIVE] /

npub1nfr…dtxs

2023-06-07 17:56:59

in reply to nevent1q…9zwt

📅 Original date posted:2017-03-08
📝 Original message:> Am 08.03.2017 um 22:09 schrieb Eric Voskuil <eric at voskuil.org>:
>
> On 03/08/2017 11:47 AM, Jonas Schnelli wrote:
>>>> Nodes are by design not supposed to be identifiable in any way
>>>
>>> This is of course my objection to BIP150 ("a way for peers to ...
>>> guarantee node ownership“).
>>
>> Please Eric. Stop spreading FUD.
>
> I'm always willing to debate this issue. I'm generally a little
> suspicious of one who demands another person to stop arguing. I got at
> least one such demand (along with a threat) on this subject privately
> last summer from a notable Core dev. There is a lengthy thread on this
> subject in which I raised these issues. Everyone is free to review that
> discussion.

What you did say in the sentence above (and I think is FUD) is, that BIP150 will lead to every node being identifiable. This is just completely wrong.
There is nothing to say against a technical debate (and we had this), but I will ask you to stop if I see you attacking BIP150/151 at every occasion with FUDish arguments like this.

</jonas>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170308/c29e775d/attachment.sig>;

Author Public Key

npub1nfrrurat393mqymf3s26pujyn5vujlem3pzcukr5p9d4qpklngxq43dtxs

Seen on

wss://relay.nostr.band

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 17:56:59

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "5f6da6e494c5efcc77d1fabdec9242f665ebddafe5da2f52ccdd2d251b208057", "pubkey": "9a463e0fab8963b013698c15a0f2449d19c97f3b88458e5874095b5006df9a0c", "created_at": 1686160619, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "9dd5ee30e00a8982beef06bc0de72f4df99da3649e3263091c6819d269e9eb1c", "", "root" ], [ "e", "68ab1b70a49900a52e18f28908e9efcd8e327ff2e89839508c256265c2efb999", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "82205f272f995d9be742779a3c19a2ae08522ca14824c3a3b01525fb5459161e" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-03-08\n📝 Original message:\u003e Am 08.03.2017 um 22:09 schrieb Eric Voskuil \u003ceric at voskuil.org\u003e:\n\u003e \n\u003e On 03/08/2017 11:47 AM, Jonas Schnelli wrote:\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\u003e Nodes are by design not supposed to be identifiable in any way\n\u003e\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e\u003e This is of course my objection to BIP150 (\"a way for peers to ...\n\u003e\u003e\u003e guarantee node ownership“).\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e Please Eric. Stop spreading FUD.\n\u003e \n\u003e I'm always willing to debate this issue. I'm generally a little\n\u003e suspicious of one who demands another person to stop arguing. I got at\n\u003e least one such demand (along with a threat) on this subject privately\n\u003e last summer from a notable Core dev. There is a lengthy thread on this\n\u003e subject in which I raised these issues. Everyone is free to review that\n\u003e discussion.\n\nWhat you did say in the sentence above (and I think is FUD) is, that BIP150 will lead to every node being identifiable. This is just completely wrong.\nThere is nothing to say against a technical debate (and we had this), but I will ask you to stop if I see you attacking BIP150/151 at every occasion with FUDish arguments like this.\n\n\u003c/jonas\u003e\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 833 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170308/c29e775d/attachment.sig\u003e", "sig": "055ba355b7004db163b5b10d399691ff964a157cb0f691df338774bdcfd273b3cef7d403c8f5fb6998bbfd58d7ca827f36bc71ffdc07509eb9d648498862c551" }