KryptoJoe on Nostr: I would argue that you don't need the "national" in front of the socialism to become ...
I would argue that you don't need the "national" in front of the socialism to become fascism.
Most of the socialist "systems" had the wealth of the "nation" or the peoples in mind.
If you want to have a division between the international ones it could make sense though.
Otherwise every socialism means fascism.
Published at
2025-03-17 15:09:45Event JSON
{
"id": "5f35af784918a7bd46ac187993cee4e10c0cedac2b1c2845cc8fc7eabd08b1f3",
"pubkey": "a39d19ec238af1b14b8cf36185a933b141f994e2ff7a1323a4cbb65f3d88f61e",
"created_at": 1742224185,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d9dfd432e6c8ed100b3d2b9dea71b409867d5766c55ec125220344fdc8c02584",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e04e87f58e90895870286072e6e1d728346c5b19ae20670b86547bc983e5d0e1",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3731e169d0b3816f4a4a9ac84c66aa423d4f4ea0f78b56a1df90609b85be0885"
],
[
"p",
"95c33bfbb96b0f463cb80f6f2e229ded74f36e9694e6b04dec5124e4ef6bde66"
]
],
"content": "I would argue that you don't need the \"national\" in front of the socialism to become fascism.\nMost of the socialist \"systems\" had the wealth of the \"nation\" or the peoples in mind. \nIf you want to have a division between the international ones it could make sense though. \nOtherwise every socialism means fascism.",
"sig": "fd4125aba84b593995078a6d7f4f4f17f788a1f3c7a6c88144d41b081a27d1347a7cd87dbd29b3c8b346078a07d83944e1cf2a7dd62a490e16b52726dd94b13c"
}
