Alp on Nostr: I like controversial topics. Again, it's the "you must fight for your right" fraction ...

I like controversial topics. Again, it's the "you must fight for your right" fraction versus "make things easier for wider adoption" fraction.

I'm inclined to both. I don't have a certain stance on this, I admit. As a UX engineer, I tend towards the latter. As someone who believes in the Turkish proverb 'nerde çokluk, orda bokluk' ('where there's plenty, there's shit') and has already experienced it multiple times on the internet (and as a closet Darwinist), I tend towards the former. Let's see which side prevails.

quoting nevent1q…3f6t

There's this notion in Bitcoin that we are building tools to help the world become a better place – but when faced with actual, real world problems, responses are often reactionary and self-serving.

Bitcoin isn't private enough? You're just not using the right tools. The tools are too complicated? You're just not dedicated enough to the cause. Bitcoin fixes all your problems, you just need to spend countless hours of your life to understanding it.

Yesterday, fightfortheftr (nprofile…y264) released a report on the usability of Bitcoin (and privacy coins) for activists, and it's a sobering look at how builders in this space have failed those they claim to help protect.

No-KYC on- and off-ramps are still too hard to use. Coins need to be swapped between networks or privatized with dedicated software. Self-custody is easy, but wallets offering network-level protections are often not directed at non-technical users.

We can ignore these criticisms if we want. Or we can stop gaslighting users and skeptics alike for not being educated or engaged enough, and start dedicating more resources to building tools that actually serve the needs of those who need it most.


https://www.fightforthefuture.org/news/2025-01-15-report-release-call-to-action-financial-confidentiality-in-the-age-of-digital-surveillance/