Laffy on Nostr: 4/ npub1crluu…fmv08 responds to Vance: Lots of people objecting to this. ...
4/ npub1crluuzflt4hfj8clmccw4pfhkdf2u02fehr5a398t3qa9kwj0emsrfmv08 (npub1crl…mv08) responds to Vance: Lots of people objecting to this.
@JoyceWhiteVance is right: Discussions like this go on all the time when competent lawyers have competent clients.
A more likely offer, I'd say, would be a 2071 guilty plea, which DQs for further office, to drop Espionage. 2071, remember, has just a 3 year penalty, as opposed to 10 years per doc. It SHOULD be among the offers on the table.
But Trump would have to agree to be DQed from running.
@JoyceWhiteVance is right: Discussions like this go on all the time when competent lawyers have competent clients.
A more likely offer, I'd say, would be a 2071 guilty plea, which DQs for further office, to drop Espionage. 2071, remember, has just a 3 year penalty, as opposed to 10 years per doc. It SHOULD be among the offers on the table.
But Trump would have to agree to be DQed from running.