Scoundrel on Nostr: It's very simple. If the person I'm talking with has used the word first, then I ...
It's very simple. If the person I'm talking with has used the word first, then I don't define "man" at all. They do.
If the common definition of "man" was "any adult who 'identifies' as male" then would you accept the definition? If so, then I think you would be an idiot. People shouldn't let common definitions decide for them what ideas they are thinking and communicating.
Published at
2025-03-09 17:03:41Event JSON
{
"id": "58f825e045894ab1d30f529c10134d7cad69a7a581fb4d174339e79b186f5963",
"pubkey": "a87b402ac081c8849b9d5bd4e39f2287f25709d3e3f79e784af1e8b38fefbdf1",
"created_at": 1741539821,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ab46edf60d1a724b72eea523120525c505411139fd75288d3e8f4ad644f7e191",
"wss://relay.damus.io/",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d24a093cdb00e0e87d9d66d0c7d295a9d07db3943606849d722eca8fc39f435f",
"wss://relay.damus.io/",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"c5e173798dad29dd2b8062b8310974aed0a72e3645f9e58d2129bc6abd15d8bf",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "It's very simple. If the person I'm talking with has used the word first, then I don't define \"man\" at all. They do.\n\nIf the common definition of \"man\" was \"any adult who 'identifies' as male\" then would you accept the definition? If so, then I think you would be an idiot. People shouldn't let common definitions decide for them what ideas they are thinking and communicating.",
"sig": "6832b47108e220654724a758ce82848a48e605b95e12b4d7ef2afa562d90b3187f2e56381b47431559c3a431a29979d35e11a43de59fe6a56470e7eedbba5662"
}