What is Nostr?
pahueg /
npub1qhxโ€ฆ04l8
2024-10-16 10:40:27

pahueg on Nostr: ๐“๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐“๐‡๐„ ๐ƒ๐ž๐Ÿ๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ง๐  ...

๐“๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐“๐‡๐„ ๐ƒ๐ž๐Ÿ๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ง๐  ๐๐ฎ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐Ž๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ƒ๐ž๐œ๐š๐๐ž

Would you rather take a shrinking risk of holding something that might lose all real value, or face a growing risk of holding something that almost certainly will?

Let me explain:

On one hand, you have Bitcoin. Itโ€™s a revolutionary asset with a capped supply and an adoption curve that hasnโ€™t peaked yet. Yes, thereโ€™s still riskโ€”itโ€™s a new technology. But according to the Lindy effect, the longer it sticks around, the less likely it is to fail.

On the other hand, you have government bonds. They form the bedrock of todayโ€™s financial system, and thanks to implicit (and increasingly explicit) government backing, their survival in nominal terms seems guaranteed. However, due to the mounting pressure of the debt spiral, the chance of these bonds going to zero in real termsโ€”thanks to inflation and devaluationโ€”is on the rise.

So, which risk would you rather run?

#Bitcoin #BTC #Governmentbonds #treasuries
Author Public Key
npub1qhx7lnggpv64f0wt5xyjj7h90qh5ewu35pspr66sj8alc4gvcfjqqn04l8