Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-05-08 📝 Original message:On Sat, May 9, 2015 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-05-08
📝 Original message:On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Damian Gomez <dgomez1092 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ...of the following:
>
> the DH_GENERATION would in effect calculate the reponses for a total
> overage of the public component, by addding a ternary option in the actual
> DH key (which I have attached to sse if you can iunderstand my logic)
[snip code]
Intriguing; and certainly a change of the normal pace around here.
> where w represents the weight of the total number of semantical
> constraints that an idivdual has expressed throught emotivoe packets that I
> am working on (implementation os difficutlt). I think this is the
> appropriate route to implemeting a greating block size that will be used in
> preventing interception of bundled informations and replace value. Client
> side implmentation will cut down transaction fees for the additional 264 bit
> implementation and greatly reduce need for ewallet providers to do so.
In these posts I am reminded of and sense some qualitative
similarities with a 2012 proposal by Mr. NASDAQEnema of Bitcointalk
with respect to multigenerational token architectures. In particula,r
your AES ModuleK Hashcodes (especially in light of Winternitz
compression) may constitute an L_2 norm attractor similar to the
motherbase birthpoint metric presented in that prior work. Rethaw and
I provided a number of points for consideration which may be equally
applicable to your work:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=57253.msg682056#msg682056
Your invocation of emotive packets suggests that you may be a
colleague of Mr. Virtuli Beatnik? While not (yet) recognized as a
star developer himself; his eloquent language and his mastery of skb
crypto-calculus and differential-kernel number-ontologies demonstrated
in his latest publication ( https://archive.org/details/EtherealVerses
) makes me think that he'd be an ideal collaborator for your work in
this area.
📝 Original message:On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Damian Gomez <dgomez1092 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ...of the following:
>
> the DH_GENERATION would in effect calculate the reponses for a total
> overage of the public component, by addding a ternary option in the actual
> DH key (which I have attached to sse if you can iunderstand my logic)
[snip code]
Intriguing; and certainly a change of the normal pace around here.
> where w represents the weight of the total number of semantical
> constraints that an idivdual has expressed throught emotivoe packets that I
> am working on (implementation os difficutlt). I think this is the
> appropriate route to implemeting a greating block size that will be used in
> preventing interception of bundled informations and replace value. Client
> side implmentation will cut down transaction fees for the additional 264 bit
> implementation and greatly reduce need for ewallet providers to do so.
In these posts I am reminded of and sense some qualitative
similarities with a 2012 proposal by Mr. NASDAQEnema of Bitcointalk
with respect to multigenerational token architectures. In particula,r
your AES ModuleK Hashcodes (especially in light of Winternitz
compression) may constitute an L_2 norm attractor similar to the
motherbase birthpoint metric presented in that prior work. Rethaw and
I provided a number of points for consideration which may be equally
applicable to your work:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=57253.msg682056#msg682056
Your invocation of emotive packets suggests that you may be a
colleague of Mr. Virtuli Beatnik? While not (yet) recognized as a
star developer himself; his eloquent language and his mastery of skb
crypto-calculus and differential-kernel number-ontologies demonstrated
in his latest publication ( https://archive.org/details/EtherealVerses
) makes me think that he'd be an ideal collaborator for your work in
this area.