PABLOF7z on Nostr: ah lol, the kind:9 was supposed to be a delete so that takes care of point #1 -- we ...
ah lol, the kind:9 was supposed to be a delete so that takes care of point #1 -- we agree on that 😅
For the amethyst example, the way I would think of it is you REQ for the people I follow with a "k", "20" using that as part of the filter, so you might REQ for "kinds": [1,20,30023,30818, etc etc] for the people in your kind:3 and only REQ for "kinds": [20] for the others.
defining a type of "app" is far more subjective and will become a very confusing art form, whereas kind numbers are much more narrowly defined, the onlyfans segmentation would happen at the pubkey/relay level at the very least, so I think that's a non-problem.
There's also the categorized user lists, but I think that's more of a power-user tool.
For the amethyst example, the way I would think of it is you REQ for the people I follow with a "k", "20" using that as part of the filter, so you might REQ for "kinds": [1,20,30023,30818, etc etc] for the people in your kind:3 and only REQ for "kinds": [20] for the others.
defining a type of "app" is far more subjective and will become a very confusing art form, whereas kind numbers are much more narrowly defined, the onlyfans segmentation would happen at the pubkey/relay level at the very least, so I think that's a non-problem.
There's also the categorized user lists, but I think that's more of a power-user tool.