PABLOF7z on Nostr: yeah, maybe -- but I think we need to have some control over this, right now it's ...
yeah, maybe -- but I think we need to have some control over this, right now it's all-or-nothing -- you follow them across all of nostr or you follow them nowhere -- I think some level of granularity is important.
Not sure where's the UX balance yet though.
Perhaps if I follow someone on Olas then when I open Amethyst it can ask me "oh, I see you followed XX's pictures, do you want to see their tweets too? [Yes] [Always]"
I don't know, that's probably a bad UX since it has a large cognitive load.
Perhaps Amethyst could start showing me some of their kind:1s too with a "follow" button next to them, kinda like the new person's content starts creeping in into my feed
Not sure.
That said, moving away from a huge follow list has been long overdue; the right UX of how much granularity is the right level is still to be seen.
Not sure where's the UX balance yet though.
Perhaps if I follow someone on Olas then when I open Amethyst it can ask me "oh, I see you followed XX's pictures, do you want to see their tweets too? [Yes] [Always]"
I don't know, that's probably a bad UX since it has a large cognitive load.
Perhaps Amethyst could start showing me some of their kind:1s too with a "follow" button next to them, kinda like the new person's content starts creeping in into my feed
Not sure.
That said, moving away from a huge follow list has been long overdue; the right UX of how much granularity is the right level is still to be seen.