stf on Nostr: nprofile1q…e4gg3 nprofile1q…004tj Chris Trottier essentially you repeat me when i ...
nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqw6d0ahgsr65xeeucfadr99xh65fq7d7hyrs3vj49s2vvcpsu9p9qne4gg3 (nprofile…4gg3) nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqaqkgwhugu62e628cg6sgheez5vfestk5yknrr3ugy4qe6p46756q5004tj (nprofile…04tj) Chris Trottier (nprofile…rtmv) essentially you repeat me when i said:
> all they say: "the implications are not clear" and then they comment on the privacy policy of bluesky and how the gdpr applies to that. none of this is really about the content of posts and the applicability of the GDPR...
but none of this actually in anyway touches on the question if content is actually covered by the GDPR.
as we now run in circles, i consider this thread EOL. please fight windmills with someone else.
> all they say: "the implications are not clear" and then they comment on the privacy policy of bluesky and how the gdpr applies to that. none of this is really about the content of posts and the applicability of the GDPR...
but none of this actually in anyway touches on the question if content is actually covered by the GDPR.
as we now run in circles, i consider this thread EOL. please fight windmills with someone else.