Pavol Rusnak [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23 📝 Original message:On 04/23/2014 10:54 PM, ...
📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23
📝 Original message:On 04/23/2014 10:54 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> Would you consider software which scans all accounts as specified by
> BIP64, but has no user interface option to distinguish them in any
> way, view them independently, and has no ability to keep the coins
> apart... compatible with BIP64?
This is not a desired behavior. Do you have any idea how to make it even
more explicit in the spec? Currently we just have (in Account sectrion):
"This level splits the key space into independent user identities, so
the wallet never mixes the coins across different accounts."
I would like to make it obvious from the spec that if you mix funds
accross the accounts you are not doing a right thing and you are not
compliant to the spec.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol Rusnak <stick at gk2.sk>
📝 Original message:On 04/23/2014 10:54 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> Would you consider software which scans all accounts as specified by
> BIP64, but has no user interface option to distinguish them in any
> way, view them independently, and has no ability to keep the coins
> apart... compatible with BIP64?
This is not a desired behavior. Do you have any idea how to make it even
more explicit in the spec? Currently we just have (in Account sectrion):
"This level splits the key space into independent user identities, so
the wallet never mixes the coins across different accounts."
I would like to make it obvious from the spec that if you mix funds
accross the accounts you are not doing a right thing and you are not
compliant to the spec.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol Rusnak <stick at gk2.sk>