npub1skvad…laky3 npub1a7mgd…gj0p9 npub15swlx…zx855 npub1xkwas…e7jwu Sorry if ...

npub146n…vczd

2023-09-05 23:39:48

in reply to nevent1q…0ctk

npub1skvad2l2wrxgdmt6yxk9kt2rjhw5tucjzhf54pktfq2gg0qhgwyqdlaky3 (npub1skv…aky3) npub1a7mgdv59qdx5p2ajp7y0wk3e7y4sw05kquew8nkw06gv99zaz5sspgj0p9 (npub1a7m…j0p9) npub15swlxudlhx4ttcgsd4556zuqrl57qndxmt4n3dnzrkqn89nxv6lsjzx855 (npub15sw…x855) npub1xkwaswarxtyfywx0exf0ve9kheuzj4c6py745r6fvfm0nfz6ctlsne7jwu (npub1xkw…7jwu)

Sorry if I'm not including everyone here.

I think we need more jargon in neuroscience (mind/brain).

Couple of examples. Examine the mess that is the debate about "consciousness" because (in part) so many senses are mixed, including "sentience", "awareness", etc.

Or the fact that we use basically folk psychological terms all the time. So even if qualify what I mean by attention* in one of my papers, using a term that is used in a dozen ways will surely lead to confusion.

Our mind/brain field is highly technical, but the language surprisingly accessible to most people. That's a problem not because we want to be "distinguished professors" but because of the complete terminological confusion we inhabit!

I couldn't read all the discussion, so apologies if this was already discussed and debunked... 🙂

#neuroscience

Author Public Key

npub146nd5arcp9y460fqlz4mpk3hhhujcd3p8gpl8mpy0q7epny542sslzvczd

Show more details

Published at

2023-09-05 23:39:48

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "770ecce89bb6b0ae44a16cbe2b62270986eac35dbb2c269f4eed071d054a3d30", "pubkey": "aea6da747809495d3d20f8abb0da37bdf92c36213a03f3ec24783d90cc94aaa1", "created_at": 1693957188, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "p", "8599d6abea70cc86ed7a21ac5b2d4395dd45f31215d34a86cb4814843c174388", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "efb686b285034d40abb20f88f75a39f12b073e960732e3cece7e90c2945d1521", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "a41df371bfb9aab5e1106d694d0b801fe9e04da6daeb38b6621d8133966666bf", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "359dd83ba332c89238cfc992f664b6be7829571a093d5a0f496276f9a45ac2ff", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "c71a5284689572bfd0beef4cbb9b331e25b49be5535123c2692f4a13e17c0a48", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "9646be5cf3e9881f714e661e26c5fd1b5c65bdc7c822f1085057f3341ff02777", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "32b1255615e9848f3e76314b460d27fada96f9042690c62eadbe35ce742273ef", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "931d80e8806aa8e388c02733a74bf7bbbef68e9350568fe63034ee1c42458353", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "e", "f42b1e1b432e36d0335889aa9aff8e600e1a024c11f575dd0b12cfc48e3131ed", "wss://relay.mostr.pub", "reply" ], [ "t", "neuroscience" ], [ "proxy", "https://neuromatch.social/users/PessoaBrain/statuses/111015178294276136", "activitypub" ] ], "content": "nostr:npub1skvad2l2wrxgdmt6yxk9kt2rjhw5tucjzhf54pktfq2gg0qhgwyqdlaky3 nostr:npub1a7mgdv59qdx5p2ajp7y0wk3e7y4sw05kquew8nkw06gv99zaz5sspgj0p9 nostr:npub15swlxudlhx4ttcgsd4556zuqrl57qndxmt4n3dnzrkqn89nxv6lsjzx855 nostr:npub1xkwaswarxtyfywx0exf0ve9kheuzj4c6py745r6fvfm0nfz6ctlsne7jwu \n\nSorry if I'm not including everyone here.\n\nI think we need more jargon in neuroscience (mind/brain). \n\nCouple of examples. Examine the mess that is the debate about \"consciousness\" because (in part) so many senses are mixed, including \"sentience\", \"awareness\", etc.\n\nOr the fact that we use basically folk psychological terms all the time. So even if qualify what I mean by attention* in one of my papers, using a term that is used in a dozen ways will surely lead to confusion.\n\nOur mind/brain field is highly technical, but the language surprisingly accessible to most people. That's a problem not because we want to be \"distinguished professors\" but because of the complete terminological confusion we inhabit!\n\nI couldn't read all the discussion, so apologies if this was already discussed and debunked... 🙂 \n\n#neuroscience", "sig": "674b3508a85ab493ff908d1666a29e097f78f94b610fba6b5bbc8ae7cf6b9b7b76088af62aa6c543a7695f38a5609975d66221b0dbd548c64472434395a2964c" }