Joey.Matto on Nostr: Using the Hebrew thought process : Leviticus 19 : 18 Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear ...
Using the Hebrew thought process :
Leviticus 19 : 18
Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the Lord.
In conjunction with Mark 12 : 30 , 31
And thou shalt love the Lord thy G - D with all thy heart , and with all thy soul , and with all thy mind , and with all thy strength : this is the first commandment .
And the second is like, namely this, thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself . There is none other commandment greater than these .
So the larger question would be , YASHUA is a Teacher of Israel & is also G - D , therefore , as is stated in the Levitical law ( Hebrew administrative religious law ) ; Leviticus 19 : 18 , man needs the moral code of G - D to remind him of duties to neighbours , even to the stranger in the land ; when man uses his free will to violate his neighbour’s free will is man subject to the moral precepts of G - D or will he guide himself under non consequential anarchy , violating the rights & freedom of his neighbours ?
This ties into the previous post regarding good & evil ; there cannot be one without the other ; & if man is a free moral agent , endowed with free will , without good or evil constructs , how will he know what is right ?
Leviticus 19 : 18
Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the Lord.
In conjunction with Mark 12 : 30 , 31
And thou shalt love the Lord thy G - D with all thy heart , and with all thy soul , and with all thy mind , and with all thy strength : this is the first commandment .
And the second is like, namely this, thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself . There is none other commandment greater than these .
So the larger question would be , YASHUA is a Teacher of Israel & is also G - D , therefore , as is stated in the Levitical law ( Hebrew administrative religious law ) ; Leviticus 19 : 18 , man needs the moral code of G - D to remind him of duties to neighbours , even to the stranger in the land ; when man uses his free will to violate his neighbour’s free will is man subject to the moral precepts of G - D or will he guide himself under non consequential anarchy , violating the rights & freedom of his neighbours ?
This ties into the previous post regarding good & evil ; there cannot be one without the other ; & if man is a free moral agent , endowed with free will , without good or evil constructs , how will he know what is right ?