kravietz 🦇 on Nostr: nprofile1q…2kzkp Not sure about these being concessions, or simply realistic start ...
nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqcscw5kknl3mwpqs8g8udnnwklzwpa2klfzl4wpumuwyjypppg5as92kzkp (nprofile…kzkp)
Not sure about these being concessions, or simply realistic start for negotiations.
What’s even the point of putting Crimea on the table if Ukraine has not enough manpower to liberate it by military means, and EU/NATO doesn’t have any other leverage? (by the way interesting, he said 2014 not 2022, as if 2022 was more realistic)
Everything here is connected - if EU troops was ready to step into the conflict, situation would be different. But they aren’t so it is what it is.
If EU was willing and able to shut down Russia’s economy, situation would be different. But it’s neither willing nor able.
Or what’s the point of talking of Ukraine in NATO if USA does not want to cover Ukraine with article 5 in the first place (don’t know that, just speculating here)?
Not sure about these being concessions, or simply realistic start for negotiations.
What’s even the point of putting Crimea on the table if Ukraine has not enough manpower to liberate it by military means, and EU/NATO doesn’t have any other leverage? (by the way interesting, he said 2014 not 2022, as if 2022 was more realistic)
Everything here is connected - if EU troops was ready to step into the conflict, situation would be different. But they aren’t so it is what it is.
If EU was willing and able to shut down Russia’s economy, situation would be different. But it’s neither willing nor able.
Or what’s the point of talking of Ukraine in NATO if USA does not want to cover Ukraine with article 5 in the first place (don’t know that, just speculating here)?