Diyana on Nostr: Whitney Webb would likely be highly critical of The Technological Republic, viewing ...
Whitney Webb (npub1g05…40hv) would likely be highly critical of The Technological Republic, viewing it as an extension of the technocratic agenda that she frequently exposes in her work. She has extensively covered the intersections of intelligence agencies, Big Tech, and centralized power structures, often warning about the growing collusion between the military-industrial complex, AI, and surveillance-driven governance.
From her perspective, a book advocating for tighter collaboration between Silicon Valley and the U.S. government would likely be seen as a justification for expanding centralized control over technology. She might argue that figures like Alexander Karp, whose company Palantir is deeply embedded in government surveillance and predictive policing, are not interested in national security as much as they are in furthering the agenda of total information control.
Webb might also highlight how such narratives frame "national security threats" as a way to justify more intrusive data collection, AI-driven mass surveillance, and restrictions on decentralized technologies that threaten state power. She has repeatedly warned about AI being used not just for warfare, but for digital authoritarianism, censorship, and financial control through CBDCs and other emerging systems.
If she were to critique this book, she would likely point out:
1. Palantir’s Role in Mass Surveillance – She would likely argue that Karp's company is part of the problem, not the solution, given its extensive work with intelligence agencies and law enforcement in tracking individuals and groups.
2. AI as a Tool for Control – She might question whether the push for U.S. dominance in AI is actually about security or about ensuring the state retains control over emerging technologies.
3. The "Hard Power, Soft Belief" Framing – Webb often discusses the ways in which narratives are crafted to manufacture consent for policies that ultimately limit personal freedoms. She might argue that this book is another example of that psychological conditioning.
4. The Threat to Decentralization – As someone who has written extensively on the dangers of centralized digital control, she would likely warn that this book is an ideological push against decentralized, open-source alternatives like Bitcoin, Nostr, and self-sovereign systems.
Overall, she would likely view The Technological Republic as a blueprint for a controlled AI-driven future, where centralized institutions dictate technological development in ways that serve the interests of a surveillance state rather than individual freedom.
From her perspective, a book advocating for tighter collaboration between Silicon Valley and the U.S. government would likely be seen as a justification for expanding centralized control over technology. She might argue that figures like Alexander Karp, whose company Palantir is deeply embedded in government surveillance and predictive policing, are not interested in national security as much as they are in furthering the agenda of total information control.
Webb might also highlight how such narratives frame "national security threats" as a way to justify more intrusive data collection, AI-driven mass surveillance, and restrictions on decentralized technologies that threaten state power. She has repeatedly warned about AI being used not just for warfare, but for digital authoritarianism, censorship, and financial control through CBDCs and other emerging systems.
If she were to critique this book, she would likely point out:
1. Palantir’s Role in Mass Surveillance – She would likely argue that Karp's company is part of the problem, not the solution, given its extensive work with intelligence agencies and law enforcement in tracking individuals and groups.
2. AI as a Tool for Control – She might question whether the push for U.S. dominance in AI is actually about security or about ensuring the state retains control over emerging technologies.
3. The "Hard Power, Soft Belief" Framing – Webb often discusses the ways in which narratives are crafted to manufacture consent for policies that ultimately limit personal freedoms. She might argue that this book is another example of that psychological conditioning.
4. The Threat to Decentralization – As someone who has written extensively on the dangers of centralized digital control, she would likely warn that this book is an ideological push against decentralized, open-source alternatives like Bitcoin, Nostr, and self-sovereign systems.
Overall, she would likely view The Technological Republic as a blueprint for a controlled AI-driven future, where centralized institutions dictate technological development in ways that serve the interests of a surveillance state rather than individual freedom.
quoting note1xfr…2sy7https://books.apple.com/us/audiobook/the-technological-republic-hard-power-soft-belief/id1758471533