Alejandro Ranchal Pedrosa [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2018-03-29 📝 Original message: Hello all, Christian ...
📅 Original date posted:2018-03-29
📝 Original message:
Hello all,
Christian Decker pointed the following out
(source:https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2018-February/000991.html):
>I'd also like to point out that the way we do state invalidations in
>Lightning is not really suited for multi-party negotiations beyond 2
>parties. The number of potential reactions to a party cheating grows
>exponentially in the number of parties in the contract, which is the
>reason the Channel Factories paper relies on the Duplex Micropayment
>Channel construction instead of the retaliation construction in LN.
Can somebody ellaborate on this assumption?
Best,
Alejandro.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20180329/3b672012/attachment.html>;
📝 Original message:
Hello all,
Christian Decker pointed the following out
(source:https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2018-February/000991.html):
>I'd also like to point out that the way we do state invalidations in
>Lightning is not really suited for multi-party negotiations beyond 2
>parties. The number of potential reactions to a party cheating grows
>exponentially in the number of parties in the contract, which is the
>reason the Channel Factories paper relies on the Duplex Micropayment
>Channel construction instead of the retaliation construction in LN.
Can somebody ellaborate on this assumption?
Best,
Alejandro.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20180329/3b672012/attachment.html>;