Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-04-26 📝 Original message:> > Let's assume we use ...
📅 Original date posted:2014-04-26
📝 Original message:>
> Let's assume we use one shared branch for everyone. Then two cosigners
> could need a new receiving address at the same time, and get the next
> unused address on that branch.
>
This is the part I struggle to understand. There is no shared branch
because each user/cosigner has their own unique seed and thus unique key
hierarchy, right? What you described above could be an issue if all
co-signers shared the same seed but then the scheme wouldn't work.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140426/88fbb7de/attachment.html>
📝 Original message:>
> Let's assume we use one shared branch for everyone. Then two cosigners
> could need a new receiving address at the same time, and get the next
> unused address on that branch.
>
This is the part I struggle to understand. There is no shared branch
because each user/cosigner has their own unique seed and thus unique key
hierarchy, right? What you described above could be an issue if all
co-signers shared the same seed but then the scheme wouldn't work.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140426/88fbb7de/attachment.html>