Btc Drak [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-08-19 📝 Original message:On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-08-19
📝 Original message:On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Jorge Timón <jtimon at jtimon.cc> wrote:

> I don't think just using version=4 for cltv and friends would be a
> problem if it wasn't for the XT/nonXT issue.


What problem am I missing if we just mask of the offending bits. For my own
project which uses auxpow (and thus has weird nVersion), I also used the
bitmasking method to get rid of auxpow version bits before making the
standard integer comparisons to deploy BIP66 using IsSuperMajority():

if ((block.nVersion & 0xff) >= 4 && CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority(...))
{ //...}
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150819/aeca027e/attachment.html>;