HodlMasterChief on Nostr: You clearly didn’t read the article I linked to, because you’re not responding to ...
You clearly didn’t read the article I linked to, because you’re not responding to it. It responded to your first paragraph in this comment.
In response to the second, do you have the hubris to define what God is or is not? That’s exactly what you’re doing here. You’re saying God’s not defined by a 7,000 year old religion, yet you’re attempting to define God yourself. This is exactly like, “I’m new to Bitcoin, and I’m here to fix it.” Humble yourself and study what’s been established. There’s a 7,000 year old ‘blockchain’ here, as old as human civilization, and you want to hard fork it. Lol. May I humbly suggest some books to you: Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis, The Reason for God by Timothy Keller, or better yet, the Bible itself, are good starting points.
In response to the second, do you have the hubris to define what God is or is not? That’s exactly what you’re doing here. You’re saying God’s not defined by a 7,000 year old religion, yet you’re attempting to define God yourself. This is exactly like, “I’m new to Bitcoin, and I’m here to fix it.” Humble yourself and study what’s been established. There’s a 7,000 year old ‘blockchain’ here, as old as human civilization, and you want to hard fork it. Lol. May I humbly suggest some books to you: Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis, The Reason for God by Timothy Keller, or better yet, the Bible itself, are good starting points.