李老师不是你老师 on Nostr: 审查可以让AI闭嘴，但却不能改变事实 ...
审查可以让AI闭嘴，但却不能改变事实
在询问DeepSeek民主是否至少好于独裁时，高度社会主义审查的AI给出了如下回答：
一些独裁政权实现了短期增长(如中国的经济繁荣)，但增长往往使精英受益。贫困和不平等依然存在，系统性腐败扼杀了长期进步
民主并不完美。然而，它提供了独裁政权无法提供的东西：
一种非暴力纠正错误的机制、对人类尊严的尊重以及普通民众的声音。
Censorship can silence AI, but it cannot change facts.
When asked whether democracy is at least better than dictatorship, the heavily socialist-censored AI gave the following response:
Some dictatorships have achieved short-term growth (such as China's economic prosperity), but the growth often benefits the elite. Poverty and inequality persist, while systemic corruption stifles long-term progress.
Democracy isn't perfect. However, it offers something that dictatorships cannot provide:
A non-violent mechanism to correct mistakes, respect for human dignity, and a voice for ordinary people.
在询问DeepSeek民主是否至少好于独裁时，高度社会主义审查的AI给出了如下回答：
一些独裁政权实现了短期增长(如中国的经济繁荣)，但增长往往使精英受益。贫困和不平等依然存在，系统性腐败扼杀了长期进步
民主并不完美。然而，它提供了独裁政权无法提供的东西：
一种非暴力纠正错误的机制、对人类尊严的尊重以及普通民众的声音。
Censorship can silence AI, but it cannot change facts.
When asked whether democracy is at least better than dictatorship, the heavily socialist-censored AI gave the following response:
Some dictatorships have achieved short-term growth (such as China's economic prosperity), but the growth often benefits the elite. Poverty and inequality persist, while systemic corruption stifles long-term progress.
Democracy isn't perfect. However, it offers something that dictatorships cannot provide:
A non-violent mechanism to correct mistakes, respect for human dignity, and a voice for ordinary people.