Gavin Andresen [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2011-08-24 šļø Summary of this message: Scheduling a ...
š
Original date posted:2011-08-24
šļø Summary of this message: Scheduling a blockchain split is not a good idea now. New standard transactions are a good short-term solution. Revisit in N months with a roadmap and tests.
š Original message:This discussion is convincing me that scheduling a blockchain split is
definitely the wrong idea at this time. We can revisit in N months,
when we've got a roadmap and nice unit tests and a bunch of
well-tested patches for fixing all of the things that aught to be
fixed when we DO decide a blockchain split is necessary.
There seems to be rough consensus that new, imperfect standard
transactions are a good-enough short term solution.
--
--
Gavin Andresen
šļø Summary of this message: Scheduling a blockchain split is not a good idea now. New standard transactions are a good short-term solution. Revisit in N months with a roadmap and tests.
š Original message:This discussion is convincing me that scheduling a blockchain split is
definitely the wrong idea at this time. We can revisit in N months,
when we've got a roadmap and nice unit tests and a bunch of
well-tested patches for fixing all of the things that aught to be
fixed when we DO decide a blockchain split is necessary.
There seems to be rough consensus that new, imperfect standard
transactions are a good-enough short term solution.
--
--
Gavin Andresen