Event JSON
{
"id": "71f87df24ac58ef004dc786aa1ab51802d87f9bd51ed9a8af004eb53d39d792a",
"pubkey": "b5e241404d8dc078bd7ca029b8753c08ae0cff8f3fc0d0bba63d53eba89720d2",
"created_at": 1733837057,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"imeta",
"url https://cdn.masto.host/urbanistssocial/media_attachments/files/113/628/738/444/722/400/original/cc3558a7a1adce5b.png",
"m image/png"
],
[
"p",
"26f8a66f3724fbdbb27a49743475d2a6d8bb576b37d5839f11a626947ed41267"
],
[
"e",
"dafa70f8169e3adfac8ad7cee9eef74400fff8042c3807a08ba08fbbb8704b61",
"",
"root",
"26f8a66f3724fbdbb27a49743475d2a6d8bb576b37d5839f11a626947ed41267"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://urbanists.social/@CurtAdams/113628745376441050",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://urbanists.social/users/CurtAdams/statuses/113628745376441050",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://urbanists.social/users/CurtAdams/statuses/113628745376441050",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "I would use the graphs showing yearly changes in TFP rather than overall TFP. The overall graph is biased because AI adopters had higher TFP to start with, and this could lead to the graph being misinterpreted (as I did when I looked at it; I read the paper to figure out what was going on but most won't do that.)\nhttps://cdn.masto.host/urbanistssocial/media_attachments/files/113/628/738/444/722/400/original/cc3558a7a1adce5b.png\n",
"sig": "398c58ce101ef56f294de0230d148bd8244275cd03c392a0cc6c9d5dd86870a550466795b9a40e033d737c4df3ff1800eb3138fd683a6afc8e3e113bc50cc6a4"
}
