RolloTreadway on Nostr: npub1g0tuf…3tvm4 I don't know what the outcome of this consultation will be. But I ...
npub1g0tuf634rz4suczwj7kgnecr6cyt0eu9xmp3sp0fku68mqehq4msp3tvm4 (npub1g0t…tvm4) I don't know what the outcome of this consultation will be. But I do think it pretty foolish to object to it because of general vibes about how you think it might go in the future.
We do need a major consultation and we do need investment and development in the technology and software which will enable the provision of the best possible care. And yes, this technology and software is made by private companies - but it has to be, because the NHS is not and cannot be a manufacturer.
The promise that improvements and reforms will be focused on best practice is heartening to me. I say that with a complete acceptance that politicians make grand promises and don't fulfil them on a very regular basis. And I'm concerned that the article makes no mention of staffing (and without more and better-treated staff, as I say regularly, no reform is possible).
But I do think starting a much-needed process, and fighting to ensure promises are kept, should not be dismissed because of how you think the future might pan out, because of bad vibes, because of a personal dislike of a minister who might have been shuffled away long before the process comes to fruition.
Of course, that might be because I have the unfashionable view that preventing avoidable death and injury is the most important thing for the NHS, rather than political bad vibes.
We do need a major consultation and we do need investment and development in the technology and software which will enable the provision of the best possible care. And yes, this technology and software is made by private companies - but it has to be, because the NHS is not and cannot be a manufacturer.
The promise that improvements and reforms will be focused on best practice is heartening to me. I say that with a complete acceptance that politicians make grand promises and don't fulfil them on a very regular basis. And I'm concerned that the article makes no mention of staffing (and without more and better-treated staff, as I say regularly, no reform is possible).
But I do think starting a much-needed process, and fighting to ensure promises are kept, should not be dismissed because of how you think the future might pan out, because of bad vibes, because of a personal dislike of a minister who might have been shuffled away long before the process comes to fruition.
Of course, that might be because I have the unfashionable view that preventing avoidable death and injury is the most important thing for the NHS, rather than political bad vibes.