Tekkadan, The Next Satoshi on Nostr: Yes, thank you for mentioning this. I have tried Joplin but personally prefer ...
Yes, thank you for mentioning this. I have tried Joplin but personally prefer managing information the way LogSeq does it. The main reason I included Joplin in this writeup is actually because they offer a plugin that attempts to bridge Joplin with LogSeq, by way of allowing the user to create "nested lists of nodes." It's a start, but the software is designed away from this concept, so it remains a relic amongst their ecosystem which is rarely used.
However, what you share is relevant- the flexibility of Joplin's third-party ecosystem appears to be their greatest asset.
Published at
2025-01-21 00:07:23Event JSON
{
"id": "7f82232c2f16fa9789b44d2a62a8e58670d0d9d2a6d8d453c81272e86d2def5a",
"pubkey": "50809a53fef95904513a840d4082a92b45cd5f1b9e436d9d2b92a89ce091f164",
"created_at": 1737418043,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"72eef5d188ad6d02a7f34be498abcede995933afa75cd24889831c6d0abf781c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"50809a53fef95904513a840d4082a92b45cd5f1b9e436d9d2b92a89ce091f164"
],
[
"p",
"068334b2f9cd5e30b43866c4b60bd31234e29be9bc11b06af037ec248df4f7ae"
],
[
"a",
"30023:50809a53fef95904513a840d4082a92b45cd5f1b9e436d9d2b92a89ce091f164:1718285188314",
"",
"root"
]
],
"content": "Yes, thank you for mentioning this. I have tried Joplin but personally prefer managing information the way LogSeq does it. The main reason I included Joplin in this writeup is actually because they offer a plugin that attempts to bridge Joplin with LogSeq, by way of allowing the user to create \"nested lists of nodes.\" It's a start, but the software is designed away from this concept, so it remains a relic amongst their ecosystem which is rarely used.\n\nHowever, what you share is relevant- the flexibility of Joplin's third-party ecosystem appears to be their greatest asset.",
"sig": "2ab02615184f4dca03e89f8dd18958d47cc2b8501aa47bc5b19a58f1da243dc6e76fdef9b367b67a77b60b42d470068104eab33fb63738c9a32708c8c962c394"
}
