James Cridland on Nostr: nprofile1q…dywdy nprofile1q…4h82d nprofile1q…f7xwn I'm absolutely fine with ...
nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqdznhhga669k20k8rjzmls6lu5uhkus9s3xcg3t2f3quswnc2sdqsgdywdy (nprofile…ywdy) nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqln5q8np5aezhtt7ztv6tah86xk4t3smjuchdvxp0u6uta056204qf4h82d (nprofile…h82d) nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqvpkystedk2lldqlkkyd084tj5e39rpxn7lad6qeq9uka7kfw9jrsuf7xwn (nprofile…7xwn) I'm absolutely fine with keeping tags in there, if they're not badly written and entirely useless for the community. This one is.
https://github.com/Podcastindex-org/podcast-namespace/discussions/584 was ignored, as ever. We've not come to a conclusion about this useless tag. Rather, it limps on, like an unloved incontinent dog, stinking out the place, because nobody has the guts to put it out of its misery.
If we want to counter accusations that Podcasting 2.0 has "failed", then ensuring that we learn from our faliures - like this tag - is really important.
It's a GREAT precedent to set - a willingness to try new things, see what sticks, and understand when we've failed. What's not to like?
https://github.com/Podcastindex-org/podcast-namespace/discussions/584 was ignored, as ever. We've not come to a conclusion about this useless tag. Rather, it limps on, like an unloved incontinent dog, stinking out the place, because nobody has the guts to put it out of its misery.
If we want to counter accusations that Podcasting 2.0 has "failed", then ensuring that we learn from our faliures - like this tag - is really important.
It's a GREAT precedent to set - a willingness to try new things, see what sticks, and understand when we've failed. What's not to like?