Protoss on Nostr: I'm an emotivist, not a relativist. You rightoids just can't separate belief from ...
I'm an emotivist, not a relativist.
You rightoids just can't separate belief from truth. If you believe in something, it's 'objectively' true. If you don't believe in something, it's 'objectively' false.
Retardation is what it is. You can accept that something is subjective and also believe in it. To demand it must be objective is stupid and dangerous.
Like what you said at the end. According to which criteria? If solely on the basis of contending with a proud man who doesn't know or care what words mean, then he is objectively disruptive and willfully stupid, things which I and anyone I'd want to speak to would consider to be bad things.
You rightoids just can't separate belief from truth. If you believe in something, it's 'objectively' true. If you don't believe in something, it's 'objectively' false.
Retardation is what it is. You can accept that something is subjective and also believe in it. To demand it must be objective is stupid and dangerous.
Like what you said at the end. According to which criteria? If solely on the basis of contending with a proud man who doesn't know or care what words mean, then he is objectively disruptive and willfully stupid, things which I and anyone I'd want to speak to would consider to be bad things.