Event JSON
{
"id": "7b463c3e7ac8019cd933db35e0dc4bb157d29e022d0e5cc432bed928b4a50c76",
"pubkey": "4aeffbc063e608206a79ff1b41092b77078be36edd39fbaf10590adfa50c9370",
"created_at": 1694302776,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"61f5c84e6f3a3a49f9fc90b8a9c421d7748c9c47794ecf28eb5f888037b793d1",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"39f82443bf330d7050cd70cea5cf9044790e87e2f83939ae30cb183f2e163279",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"e4515c42cb8fec2022e38595887f0ee1e8a8825aef723604f9a9952f917095b8",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://wandering.shop/users/annaleen/statuses/111037826735745587",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1v86usnn08gayn70ujzu2n3pp6a6ge8z8098v728tt7ygqdahj0gsex4dlg I am familiar with the case. What I'm wondering is whether there was ever a case where nobody defended the Nazis, and that led to the suppression of the speech of vulnerable groups. Because that's what the aphorism/lawsuit assume in the slippery slope argument.",
"sig": "754eaf2974b228f4701ee38279194357c4684ce7fe92c63c6ccc0cc4135f5906f7ab3ed242c6894166395797b967e25d2c00018f43f81528f4bb18b5110cf630"
}
