Vika on Nostr: Does this mean that as a potential metric for adoption, we should most likely exclude ...
Does this mean that as a potential metric for adoption, we should most likely exclude sats that are lying unused for more than some time from the market cap, and only count sats that actively change hands?
In addition, this would also exclude abandoned wallets whose owners lost the keys, which to me sounds like a good thing. These bitcoins are essentially burned and are doing nothing productive.
Published at
2023-09-13 13:47:11Event JSON
{
"id": "7949bd4b17f8360b2091de7c94529b5fd918b27bceec5cdfeb7edb7aad71f701",
"pubkey": "f16f6d84223eeb56ade3f611a4aa539d617265d44ef9ae60b02bbf95429051fc",
"created_at": 1694612831,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f9eff7c1ceddb3ca586be80cb8a098fc82b43588c454910e6b9b51328d9a5552",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"7564a27aae32ab0c593e26d134c475405e4034f7e38f61248b57e47fdf77f725"
]
],
"content": "Does this mean that as a potential metric for adoption, we should most likely exclude sats that are lying unused for more than some time from the market cap, and only count sats that actively change hands?\n\nIn addition, this would also exclude abandoned wallets whose owners lost the keys, which to me sounds like a good thing. These bitcoins are essentially burned and are doing nothing productive.",
"sig": "9d38377773adf6a5bd3dfe7e2ddc4d05e974045997c9757e2ec4890dfffac58e2e9f0878a636299e726730ba3ab2ded99bbd0d440e5d56081d0c8db26b310bf7"
}
