sms on Nostr: OK, so what he says is true. How then, can the natural opposition to being on a jury ...
OK, so what he says is true.
How then, can the natural opposition to being on a jury be addressed through insurance policies?
I mean to the point that people can volunteer to be on a jury with alacrity, because they know they won't suffer financial losses in the unlikely case they are selected.
Currently, the incentives seem constructed to make their jury system irrelevant: the judge and lawyers shape the outcome of the trial however they wish, as he explains in the Trial by Jury podcast series.
Spooner - writing 170 years ago - confirms that's been the case practically since the beginning of their gangsterment.
How then, can the natural opposition to being on a jury be addressed through insurance policies?
I mean to the point that people can volunteer to be on a jury with alacrity, because they know they won't suffer financial losses in the unlikely case they are selected.
Currently, the incentives seem constructed to make their jury system irrelevant: the judge and lawyers shape the outcome of the trial however they wish, as he explains in the Trial by Jury podcast series.
Spooner - writing 170 years ago - confirms that's been the case practically since the beginning of their gangsterment.