Gavin [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: ð Original date posted:2015-09-23 ð Original message:> On Sep 23, 2015, at ...
ð
Original date posted:2015-09-23
ð Original message:> On Sep 23, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Peter R <peter_r at gmx.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Gavin,
>
> One thing that's not clear to me is whether it is even necessary--from the perspective of the block size limit--to consider block propagation.
I didn't mention the block size limit; weak blocks are a good idea no matter the limit.
As for miners paying for the work: lots of companies contributed to the Foundation, and will contribute to the DCI. When there are big, stable, profitable companies I think we'll see them task their developers to contribute code.
I think optimizing new block propagation is interesting and important, so I plan on working on it.
ð Original message:> On Sep 23, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Peter R <peter_r at gmx.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Gavin,
>
> One thing that's not clear to me is whether it is even necessary--from the perspective of the block size limit--to consider block propagation.
I didn't mention the block size limit; weak blocks are a good idea no matter the limit.
As for miners paying for the work: lots of companies contributed to the Foundation, and will contribute to the DCI. When there are big, stable, profitable companies I think we'll see them task their developers to contribute code.
I think optimizing new block propagation is interesting and important, so I plan on working on it.