stacksatsio on Nostr: #[5] has pulled his argument apart and I find that far more compelling than ...
conza (npub1enn…sd40) has pulled his argument apart and I find that far more compelling than Lowery’s “weapon” line.
If I were a statist and wanted to defend fiat against Bitcoin, I’d seed the notion that it’s a weapon and get the Cult of The Current Thing supporters to buy in. Same as I’d attack it from a “climate change” angle on PoW as Greenpeace have taken money to do - it’s riling up the same idiots who will do the State’s bidding and demand it be banned in future.
Bitcoin is supposed to be the “don’t trust, verify” community and yet this guy making the case that it’s a weapon to the POTUS / rest of the cathedral has been embraced and not questioned nearly enough.
If I were a statist and wanted to defend fiat against Bitcoin, I’d seed the notion that it’s a weapon and get the Cult of The Current Thing supporters to buy in. Same as I’d attack it from a “climate change” angle on PoW as Greenpeace have taken money to do - it’s riling up the same idiots who will do the State’s bidding and demand it be banned in future.
Bitcoin is supposed to be the “don’t trust, verify” community and yet this guy making the case that it’s a weapon to the POTUS / rest of the cathedral has been embraced and not questioned nearly enough.