nobody on Nostr: you may disagree - but no, you don't imply you stand by them. if you evolve your ...
you may disagree - but no, you don't imply you stand by them. if you evolve your opinion - you add perspective later. otherwise there is no historiography for the origin of concept. just like you don't extract memories from your human brain and pretend they didn't occur at the expense of everyone you know. that's gaslighting systematized in practice.
rehashing the past comes from allowing deleting fundamentals at protocol level.
the "layperson"?! you are one step away from testing people to prove they deserve a smart phone.
it is not repentance to remove context. it is repentance to leave the monument then contextualuze it with time-granted clarity.
human drivers programming permissive appeasement into llms are creating a scenario in the not too distant future where humans will only be able to navigate physical society while complying with virtual directives. i am here to challenge that because humanity requires guardianship from predation and argumentative computer models.
"healing" my ass. Q.
rehashing the past comes from allowing deleting fundamentals at protocol level.
the "layperson"?! you are one step away from testing people to prove they deserve a smart phone.
it is not repentance to remove context. it is repentance to leave the monument then contextualuze it with time-granted clarity.
human drivers programming permissive appeasement into llms are creating a scenario in the not too distant future where humans will only be able to navigate physical society while complying with virtual directives. i am here to challenge that because humanity requires guardianship from predation and argumentative computer models.
"healing" my ass. Q.