rae on Nostr: The idea of "discussion" based instances just never made sense for me on pedi. I met ...
The idea of "discussion" based instances just never made sense for me on pedi. I met someone who in on the second volume of capital recently and they told me they would want to keep it separate. That's honestly most potential "maps" I would have conversations with, it would be a better convo in a different context. There aren't many people with your interests aside of being a "map".
NNIA kind of makes sense because they have an affiliation with prostasia so it is purpose-driven, but it tends to suffer from a lack of activity and other instances end up getting blocked over disagreements. So you are left with a bunch of small instances where people have to appeal to the lowest common denominator for it to be "normal social media". Most posts end up being even more banal that twitter posts. People post stuff like "rape is bad" or "I like this video game, it's good" while the twitter/other social media discussion tends to be far more engaging and interesting.
I don't really see an advantage of excising sexuality from instances that were made for sexualities. The result is often mundane and uninteresting.
NNIA kind of makes sense because they have an affiliation with prostasia so it is purpose-driven, but it tends to suffer from a lack of activity and other instances end up getting blocked over disagreements. So you are left with a bunch of small instances where people have to appeal to the lowest common denominator for it to be "normal social media". Most posts end up being even more banal that twitter posts. People post stuff like "rape is bad" or "I like this video game, it's good" while the twitter/other social media discussion tends to be far more engaging and interesting.
I don't really see an advantage of excising sexuality from instances that were made for sexualities. The result is often mundane and uninteresting.