TheBitcoinManual on Nostr: LLMs are useful for sifting through large data sets and digesting content, but who ...
LLMs are useful for sifting through large data sets and digesting content, but who gets to claim the revenue, the processor or those providing the data?
Content can live without LLMs, LLMs can't live without content and now creators of that content want a piece of the pie. As #OpenAI got bigger, as their valuations balooned, as its revenue grew this was always going to happen
How they handle it will be interesting, trying to settle with big players who will sue you and ignoring the little players who can't seems like the path forward, but why not simply pass on the revenue through #Bitcoin and the Lightning network
If paid users are prompting an #LLM and your content is used as the reference, why shouldn't some of that value be passed on to the user?
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/27/business/media/new-york-times-open-ai-microsoft-lawsuit.html
Content can live without LLMs, LLMs can't live without content and now creators of that content want a piece of the pie. As #OpenAI got bigger, as their valuations balooned, as its revenue grew this was always going to happen
How they handle it will be interesting, trying to settle with big players who will sue you and ignoring the little players who can't seems like the path forward, but why not simply pass on the revenue through #Bitcoin and the Lightning network
If paid users are prompting an #LLM and your content is used as the reference, why shouldn't some of that value be passed on to the user?
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/27/business/media/new-york-times-open-ai-microsoft-lawsuit.html