Matthew Garrett on Nostr: Something that keeps coming up is the idea that streaming media platforms *could* ...
Something that keeps coming up is the idea that streaming media platforms *could* insist on TPM-based remote attestation before granting access to the media, even if they don't at the moment. And yes, in theory they could. It would increase complexity and fragility, but it could be made to work. But what would the point be? They've already got the ability to ensure the decrypted stream is unavailable to the OS.
Published at
2025-01-02 21:11:11Event JSON
{
"id": "72b6d32e4e8b93c5c6427db52fc1e562358b6364c64e128774ca578558cf8286",
"pubkey": "ef5e80e6c74387ef14f5c6b89079f22b6847dc14365001c0ed662a20bd891677",
"created_at": 1735852271,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://nondeterministic.computer/users/mjg59/statuses/113760814433500188",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Something that keeps coming up is the idea that streaming media platforms *could* insist on TPM-based remote attestation before granting access to the media, even if they don't at the moment. And yes, in theory they could. It would increase complexity and fragility, but it could be made to work. But what would the point be? They've already got the ability to ensure the decrypted stream is unavailable to the OS.",
"sig": "ff401a1a8b98e43130845dafb187c846398b788272df21a8c3f07a26d84e6f4db61b8d8fe828fe512b80dc2bd57bdfc62b4a2d4109fd6a140fbf7488ecad44a2"
}
