sovereignbull on Nostr: FE isn't a new idea, older civilizations also believed it to be true. It's been ...
FE isn't a new idea, older civilizations also believed it to be true. It's been around since before intelligences agencies came along too. I believe it is a logically consistent position which can be reached using observations and their own data and experiments.
The cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) measurements taken by 'space' agencies over the years have consistently shown the Earth has a unique position in the cosmos, and that data suggests it does have a special place, and is geocentric. These were called 'uncomfortable results' and 'we must have made a mistake', but the results were repeated multiple times.
Observations that we can make are not consistent with their claims of curvature. If the Earth was simply larger and still curving, then none of the math would work, since it is also based on the claimed diameter. Coordinate transforms are used to obfuscate positions in the Southern hemisphere. GPS relies on an ECEF (Earth centred, Earth-fixed) coordinate system. All these things can more then adequately be explained from the perspective of a geocentric, stationary plane, because there is an equivalence in the two models.
The MMX experiment showed that the Aether exists and it also shows us the Earth is stationary using very precise interferometric lasers which were far more sensitive than they needed to be. That is where the idea of relativity came along, because they had no other way to explain the lack of a result.
Without the idea of space, they wouldn't be able to siphon off all that money into these programs. I think that is one of the reasons why they fakes the moon landings - to reinforce the belief in space, and that the money was going to good use. Similar to how they lost the telemetry data, it is convenient how they also had to edit the videos from the South Pole which would show a 24 hour sun, which they don't. That would be enough to put this topic to rest, but if its a psyop, why would they not show unedited footage of the one thing that could disprove it?
The whole thing is a house of cards in my opinion, and that is why they can never concede any points, because just one concession leads to implication after implication.
From what I have researched so far, any advanced technology (such as what would be used to 'vanish' the MH370 flight) would necessitate the existence of the aether, because there is no other way that we know of to develop the technology without using the aether as the basis for it. And it would be lead to the implication that the Earth indeed doesn't move based on the MMX result. So if anything, I think the position adds to exposing them and the lies of other cover-ups, but I get that many people are not interested in hearing it or don't believe it would affect their lives, and that's totally fine with me.
The cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) measurements taken by 'space' agencies over the years have consistently shown the Earth has a unique position in the cosmos, and that data suggests it does have a special place, and is geocentric. These were called 'uncomfortable results' and 'we must have made a mistake', but the results were repeated multiple times.
Observations that we can make are not consistent with their claims of curvature. If the Earth was simply larger and still curving, then none of the math would work, since it is also based on the claimed diameter. Coordinate transforms are used to obfuscate positions in the Southern hemisphere. GPS relies on an ECEF (Earth centred, Earth-fixed) coordinate system. All these things can more then adequately be explained from the perspective of a geocentric, stationary plane, because there is an equivalence in the two models.
The MMX experiment showed that the Aether exists and it also shows us the Earth is stationary using very precise interferometric lasers which were far more sensitive than they needed to be. That is where the idea of relativity came along, because they had no other way to explain the lack of a result.
Without the idea of space, they wouldn't be able to siphon off all that money into these programs. I think that is one of the reasons why they fakes the moon landings - to reinforce the belief in space, and that the money was going to good use. Similar to how they lost the telemetry data, it is convenient how they also had to edit the videos from the South Pole which would show a 24 hour sun, which they don't. That would be enough to put this topic to rest, but if its a psyop, why would they not show unedited footage of the one thing that could disprove it?
The whole thing is a house of cards in my opinion, and that is why they can never concede any points, because just one concession leads to implication after implication.
From what I have researched so far, any advanced technology (such as what would be used to 'vanish' the MH370 flight) would necessitate the existence of the aether, because there is no other way that we know of to develop the technology without using the aether as the basis for it. And it would be lead to the implication that the Earth indeed doesn't move based on the MMX result. So if anything, I think the position adds to exposing them and the lies of other cover-ups, but I get that many people are not interested in hearing it or don't believe it would affect their lives, and that's totally fine with me.