***Dave Hill on Nostr: npub1kld28…gh5h8 So the judge feels that simply saying, "As a Christian judge, I ...
npub1kld28ntac85hqvfjpgsje57ytw8nwna2cglpesvn5jvm4qugpanswgh5h8 (npub1kld…h5h8)
So the judge feels that simply saying, "As a Christian judge, I should not be forced to enable the marriage of such filthy evil sinful people" lines up with the core of the 303 case. See also, "as a Christian pharmacist," "as a Christian EMT," "as a Christian employer," "as a Christian hotel owner," etc. There is no bright line barrier from the #SCOTUS ruling, because "creativity" (like "religion") is not testable, esp. if that's not the actual intent of the majority.
So the judge feels that simply saying, "As a Christian judge, I should not be forced to enable the marriage of such filthy evil sinful people" lines up with the core of the 303 case. See also, "as a Christian pharmacist," "as a Christian EMT," "as a Christian employer," "as a Christian hotel owner," etc. There is no bright line barrier from the #SCOTUS ruling, because "creativity" (like "religion") is not testable, esp. if that's not the actual intent of the majority.